![]() ![]() That doesn't necessarily mean they run through the same decode pipeline, but unless you know how to handle that, it's probably difficult to tell. ![]() If you do notice a difference in coloring, it's likely that either the encoder got some properties wrong, or your player/decoder isn't properly recognising the color primaries used.Īs for decoding they were used in the same machine and same player so that should not really be an issue fine details) - the result is usually something blurrier or noisier than the original. Re-encoding mostly strips away "high frequency information" (i.e. In general, encoding shouldn't color shift stuff. Also keep in mind that, when watching a video, it's unlikely you'll be trying to pick out fine details most of the time. It's much easier to pick out fine details when comparing still images, as opposed to a moving one. Repeat the above experiment a few times to check how accurate you are (since the odds of being correct is 50/50, it's possible you'll guess it a few times).ĭo note that even if you can tell a difference in a screenshot, it doesn't mean you'll be able to tell it in video. The point of this exercise is to force you to compare things visually - the problem is that you may be sub-consciously driven to believe that there must be a fault with the re-encode, so you'll find something even if you can't actually see it. Once you've made up your mind on which is the encoded version, check yourself to see whether you're correct. Alt-Tab a few times between the two, without counting so that you forget which is which, then compare the two. If it helps, full screen both images so you can't see the filenames. two windows not side-by-side), and Alt-Tab between the windows, such that you can't readily tell the difference between the two. If you want to more properly test your theory out, screenshot each (at full resolution to a format like PNG or BMP), open both of them up on top of each other (e.g. Of course, a proper example would need to be dumped in full resolution in a lossless format (i.e. I didn't notice anything from your example. What are your thoughts?Įdit: To me the imaage for the encode seems a tad bit more pink than the remux version. Although I have seem some info online there really is limited discussions when it comes to Anime remux.Īnyway thanks for reading. I wanted to see if I can get insight from some people in this subreddit regarding anime bd encodes and remux. Encoders state that the compression of anime works really well. While a set of people believe that they want no compromises with their Anime quality they favor remuxing a BDMV source, others believe that its a waste of space and even proclaim in instances that they improve some of the flaws of the blu ray source. On the other hand for Anime I have seen people seem split on the issue. The consensus with movies and TV shows that are not anime is that a remux is usually at least noticeably better if you have the display/space to show it. ![]() But at the end of the day for me quality is King. When comparing sizes the encode version wins outright by the amount of space you save. While a 1080 BD encode can average to be 1.5- 2.00 GB per episode a remux can be anywhere from 4.5GB to 7 GB per episode. That being said the difference between the sizes of these type of files is significant. Yea the quality of videos vary show by show and encoder by encoder but usually someone that uses a BD source is on the right track in my opinion. There are so many files to choose from but after looking into it more I believe for my taste at least a BD 1080p encode and BD Remux seem to be a the top of the charts when considering just quality. Hi I was wondering if people in the community could help me out with a bit of dilemma I faced recently. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |